Member-only story

How the Law of Capture Shaped the World Oil Industry

Samuel Ward

·17.6k Followers· Follow

Published in Finders Keepers?: How The Law Of Capture Shaped The World Oil Industry

7 min read

1.1k View Claps

60 Respond

Save

Listen

The law of capture has its roots in the Roman law of property. The Roman legal scholar Gaius wrote in the 2nd century AD that "whatever is caught or taken by hunting or fishing belongs to the captor." This principle was later adopted into the common law of England and the United States.

The law of capture was first applied to oil in the United States in the early 19th century. In 1840, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the owner of land had the right to extract and own any oil that was found beneath the surface of that land. This ruling was based on the common law principle that the owner of land owned everything that was attached to it, both above and below the surface.

The law of capture quickly became the dominant legal doctrine governing the oil industry in the United States. The Supreme Court of the United States upheld the law of capture in a series of cases, including the landmark case of Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana (1900). In this case, the Court held that the owner of land had the right to extract and own any oil that migrated from beneath neighboring land.

Finders Keepers?: How the Law of Capture Shaped the World Oil Industry

by Terence Daintith

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	4679 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	738 pages

The law of capture has also been adopted by many other countries around the world, including Canada, Mexico, and Russia. However, there are some countries that have rejected the law of capture, such as Argentina and Saudi Arabia.

The law of capture has three key provisions:

The owner of land has the right to extract and own any natural resources found beneath the surface of that land.
The owner of land has the right to extract and own any natural resources that migrate from beneath neighboring land.
The owner of land has the right to use any means necessary to extract and own natural resources, even if those means cause damage to neighboring land.

These three provisions have given oil companies a great deal of freedom to explore for and produce oil. However, they have also led to a number of problems, including:

Overproduction. The law of capture encourages oil companies to produce as much oil as possible, even if there is no demand for it. This can lead to overproduction and a glut of oil on the market, which can drive down prices and make it unprofitable for oil companies to produce oil.
Waste. The law of capture also encourages oil companies to use wasteful methods of extraction. For example, oil companies may use waterflooding or hydraulic fracturing to extract oil, even though these methods can damage the environment and contaminate groundwater.
Conflict. The law of capture can lead to conflict between oil companies and neighboring landowners. For example, oil companies may drill wells on land that is owned by someone else, or they may extract oil that has migrated from beneath neighboring land. This can lead to lawsuits and other disputes.

The law of capture has a significant impact on the allocation of property rights in oil and gas. The owner of the surface land has the right to extract and own any oil and gas that is found beneath the surface, regardless of who owns the mineral rights. This can lead to disputes between surface owners and mineral owners, particularly in cases where the mineral rights have been severed from the surface rights.

The law of capture has also had a significant impact on the development of oil fields. The incentive to produce as much oil as possible has led to the development of new technologies and methods for extracting oil. However, it has also led to a number of environmental problems, such as overproduction, waste, and pollution.

The law of capture has made it difficult for governments to regulate the oil industry. The incentive to produce as much oil as possible has led to a number of problems, such as overproduction, waste, and conflict. Governments have tried to regulate the industry through a variety of means, such as taxes, quotas, and environmental regulations. However, these regulations have often been ineffective because they have not been able to overcome the incentive to produce as much oil as possible.

The law of capture has had a profound impact on the development of the world oil industry. The law has given oil companies a great deal of freedom to explore for and produce oil, but it has also led to a number of problems, including overproduction, waste, and conflict. Governments have tried to regulate the industry through a variety of means, but these regulations have often been ineffective because they have not been able to overcome the incentive to produce as much oil as possible.

The law of capture is a complex and controversial issue. There are strong arguments both for and against the law. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to maintain the law of capture is a political one.

Finders Keepers?: How the Law of Capture Shaped the World Oil Industry

by Terence Daintith

5 out of 5